A research method is defined as the procedure or technique applied by the researcher to undertake research and is concerned with carrying out an experiment, tests, surveys, interviews, etc. On the other hand, research methodology is a system of methods, used scientifically for solving the research problem. Common research methods are:
- Experiments. ...
- Surveys. ...
- Questionnaires. ...
- Interviews. ...
- Case studies. ...
- Participant and non-participant observation. ...
- Observational trials. ...
- Studies using the Delphi method.
Research methods are split broadly into quantitative and qualitative methods.
Quantitative research is perhaps simpler to define and identify. The data produced are always numerical, and they are analyzed using mathematical and statistical methods. If there are no numbers involved, then it’s not quantitative research. Some phenomena obviously lend themselves to quantitative analysis because they are already available as numbers. Examples include changes in achievement at various stages of education or the increase in the number of senior managers holding management degrees. However, even phenomena that are not obviously numerical in nature can be examined using quantitative methods.
Example: turning opinions into numbers
If you wish to carry out statistical analysis of the opinions of a group of people about a particular issue or element of their lives, you can ask them to express their relative agreement with statements and answer on a five- or seven-point scale, where 1 strongly disagrees, 2 disagrees, 3 is neutral, 4 agrees and 5 strongly agrees (the seven-point scale also has slightly agreed/disagree). Such scales are called Likert scales and enable statements of opinion to be directly translated into numerical data.
The development of Likert scales and similar techniques mean that most phenomena can be studied using quantitative techniques. This is particularly useful if you are in an environment where numbers are highly valued and numerical data is considered the ‘gold standard’. However, it is important to note that quantitative methods are not necessarily the most suitable methods for investigation. They are unlikely to be very helpful when you want to understand the detailed reasons for particular behavior in depth. It is also possible that assigning numbers to fairly abstract constructs such as personal opinions risks making them spuriously precise.
Sources of Quantitative Data:
The most common sources of quantitative data include:
- Surveys, whether conducted online, by phone or in person. These rely on the same questions being asked in the same way to a large number of people;
- Observations, which may either involve counting the number of times that a particular phenomenon occurs, such as how often a particular word is used in interviews or coding observational data to translate it into numbers; and
- Secondary data, such as company accounts.
Analyzing Quantitative Data
There is a wide range of statistical techniques available to analyze quantitative data, from simple graphs to show the data through tests of correlations between two or more items, to statistical significance. Other techniques include cluster analysis, useful for identifying relationships between groups of subjects where there is no obvious hypothesis, and hypothesis testing, to identify whether there are genuine differences between groups.
Qualitative research is any which does not involve numbers or numerical data. It often involves words or language, but may also use pictures or photographs and observations. Almost any phenomenon can be examined in a qualitative way, and it is often the preferred method of investigation in the UK and the rest of Europe; US studies tend to use quantitative methods, although this distinction is by no means absolute.
Qualitative analysis results in rich data that gives an in-depth picture and it is particularly useful for exploring how and why things have happened.
However, there are some pitfalls to qualitative research, such as:
- If respondents do not see a value for them in the research, they may provide inaccurate or false information. They may also say what they think the researcher wishes to hear. Qualitative researchers, therefore, need to take the time to build relationships with their research subjects and always be aware of this potential.
- Although ethics are an issue for any type of research, there may be particular difficulties with qualitative research because the researcher may be party to confidential information. It is important always to bear in mind that you must do no harm to your research subjects.
- It is generally harder for qualitative researchers to remain apart from their work. By the nature of their study, they are involved with people. It is therefore helpful to develop habits of reflecting on your part in the work and how this may affect the research. See our page on Reflective Practice for more.
Sources of Qualitative Data
Although qualitative data is much more general than quantitative, there are still a number of common techniques for gathering it. These include:
- Interviews, which may be structured, semi-structured or unstructured;
- Focus groups, which involve multiple participants discussing an issue;
- ‘Postcards’, or small-scale written questionnaires that ask, for example, three or four focused questions of participants but allow them space to write in their own words;
- Secondary data, including diaries, written accounts of past events, and company reports; and
- Observations, which may be on-site, or under ‘laboratory conditions’, for example, where participants are asked to role-play a situation to show what they might do.
Analyzing Qualitative Data
Because qualitative data are drawn from a wide variety of sources, they can be radically different in scope.
There are, therefore, a wide variety of methods for analyzing them, many of which involve structuring and coding the data into groups and themes. There are also a variety of computer packages to support qualitative data analysis. The best way to work out which ones are right for your research is to discuss it with academic colleagues and your supervisor.
Source and more reading: https://www.skillsyouneed.com/learn/quantitative-and-qualitative.html